HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Aloha,
No sign of life from Adobe in the past 6 months, so the Hopeless 3 development is "on hold".
I'm in process of changing the game environment and I have 3 options at this moment:
HTML5, Unity3D and Unreal Engine 4.
There are pros and cons in every case, but we're going to talk about them later.
Today we'll start with a HTML5 WebGL benchmark:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/
Use the left mouse button to move forward and the right mouse button to move backward.
You can also use the Cursor and the WSAD keys.
Please provide feedback with the following infos:
1) medium FPS value after 2-3 minutes
2) processor and graphics card
3) OS and browser
4) do you like the image quality or not?
p.s.1
HTML 5 WebGL does not need a browser plugin and "should work" on any platform: Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, etc
However, on mobile devices you might need a browser update.
p.s.2
This is a rendering benchmark only (without collisions), so you can walk through walls.
p.s.3
I was a Firefox fan from the very beginning, but this time (HTML5 WebGL) I get the best results with Google Chrome.
No sign of life from Adobe in the past 6 months, so the Hopeless 3 development is "on hold".
I'm in process of changing the game environment and I have 3 options at this moment:
HTML5, Unity3D and Unreal Engine 4.
There are pros and cons in every case, but we're going to talk about them later.
Today we'll start with a HTML5 WebGL benchmark:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/
Use the left mouse button to move forward and the right mouse button to move backward.
You can also use the Cursor and the WSAD keys.
Please provide feedback with the following infos:
1) medium FPS value after 2-3 minutes
2) processor and graphics card
3) OS and browser
4) do you like the image quality or not?
p.s.1
HTML 5 WebGL does not need a browser plugin and "should work" on any platform: Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, etc
However, on mobile devices you might need a browser update.
p.s.2
This is a rendering benchmark only (without collisions), so you can walk through walls.
p.s.3
I was a Firefox fan from the very beginning, but this time (HTML5 WebGL) I get the best results with Google Chrome.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
1) FPS 59
2) Quad core AMD A8-5600K / AMD Radeon HD 7560D
3) Win7 / Firefox (with chrome also 59 FPS)
4) I like hl2 as it is and hope hl3 will not replace it, but this update looks AWESOME!!!
2) Quad core AMD A8-5600K / AMD Radeon HD 7560D
3) Win7 / Firefox (with chrome also 59 FPS)
4) I like hl2 as it is and hope hl3 will not replace it, but this update looks AWESOME!!!
- juan507
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 18 Dec 2010, 21:12
- Location: War Zone
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
1. 59 fps
2. Intel core i7-4770-CPU@3.40GHz, AMD Radeon R7 200 series
3. Windows8/64 bits, Google Chrome
4. It looks good
2. Intel core i7-4770-CPU@3.40GHz, AMD Radeon R7 200 series
3. Windows8/64 bits, Google Chrome
4. It looks good
Fair Play ...... Not Cheat
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Flash is almost dead. Android, Mac or Youtube usually don't use it. Actually, when I see how often the flash has vulnerabilities I'm not suprised by it's coming end.Remus wrote:No sign of life from Adobe in the past 6 months
Keep in mind that is seems that plugins in web browsers could be killed too.Remus wrote:HTML 5 WebGL does not need a browser plugin and "should work" on any platform: Windows, Mac, Android, iOS, etc
However, on mobile devices you might need a browser update.
I did just a quick test: Firefox=9 FPS, Chrome Based Opera=56 FPSRemus wrote:I was a Firefox fan from the very beginning, but this time (HTML5 WebGL) I get the best results with Google Chrome
But I will stick with Firefox. I don't want to invest my time in searching Firefox add-ons alternatives for Chrome. Chrome or another version of a Chrome based web browser that is is lighter than Google Chrome will be use just for playing this game.
HTML5, Unity3D or Unreal Engine 4?
I think you could also consider support of their developers. I think nobody wants support similar to Adobe.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Windows 7 64-bit
Intel Core i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz
8.0 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Chrome: fps: 56-57 Image: excellent
Firefox: fps 4 Image: excellent
Intel Core i3 CPU 550 @ 3.20GHz
8.0 GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Chrome: fps: 56-57 Image: excellent
Firefox: fps 4 Image: excellent
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 04:02
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
1) FPS 9
2)AMD Atholn II X2 240 Processor, 3,0 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
3)Windows XP Professional SP3. Google Chrome
4)Excellent image.
2)AMD Atholn II X2 240 Processor, 3,0 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
3)Windows XP Professional SP3. Google Chrome
4)Excellent image.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: 26 Oct 2012, 01:14
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Ala shit browser or computer what you want is a new hopelees in we weigh from scratch with this new hopelees remus friend will be very grateful for what you're grasping for the game and for us players
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Thank you all for feedback.
Now to gmi (59), juan507 (59), freekarol (56), slapshot (57) and chirolaq (9):
please tell me if you get a (significant) FPS drop in the second test (two new models, one of them animated):
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test2.html
p.s.
60 FPS is the max theoretical value, so 59 FPS (after 2-3 minutes) is the perfect result.
I get 58-59 FPS with Google Chrome and 52-53 FPS with Firefox.
But it's not only that.
I get the best results with Google Chrome from another point of view:
the smoothest movement (especially when you turn left and right).
Now to gmi (59), juan507 (59), freekarol (56), slapshot (57) and chirolaq (9):
please tell me if you get a (significant) FPS drop in the second test (two new models, one of them animated):
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test2.html
p.s.
60 FPS is the max theoretical value, so 59 FPS (after 2-3 minutes) is the perfect result.
I get 58-59 FPS with Google Chrome and 52-53 FPS with Firefox.
But it's not only that.
I get the best results with Google Chrome from another point of view:
the smoothest movement (especially when you turn left and right).
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Firefox:
I get the same results for both tests, this time 58 fps. But it takes maybe 1-2 minutes longer to reach this value for test2 (i start with 40 fps). This values are constant (no fps drop), but when i turn around, the background trembles, blurs and i get streaks around the models.
Chrome:
i reached 59 fps and everything is smoother but still a bit blurry especially around the models.
IE:
20 fps, jerky graphic, very bad!
I get the same results for both tests, this time 58 fps. But it takes maybe 1-2 minutes longer to reach this value for test2 (i start with 40 fps). This values are constant (no fps drop), but when i turn around, the background trembles, blurs and i get streaks around the models.
Chrome:
i reached 59 fps and everything is smoother but still a bit blurry especially around the models.
IE:
20 fps, jerky graphic, very bad!
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I've updated the FPS counter routine and now it's lightning fast.gmi wrote:I get the same results for both tests, this time 58 fps. But it takes maybe 1-2 minutes longer to reach this value for test2 (i start with 40 fps).
You need only 2-3 seconds (instead of 2-3 minutes) to get the accurate result.
Thanks for feedback.
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Yes, much faster. Firefox now has 44-47 fps, Opera 60 fps.Remus wrote:I've updated the FPS counter routine and now it's lightning fast.gmi wrote:I get the same results for both tests, this time 58 fps. But it takes maybe 1-2 minutes longer to reach this value for test2 (i start with 40 fps).
You need only 2-3 seconds (instead of 2-3 minutes) to get the accurate result.
Thanks for feedback.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Test 2 holds a steady 59 after several minutes Graphics are beautiful!
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
- juan507
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 18 Dec 2010, 21:12
- Location: War Zone
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
59-60 fps, but I see the lines of the structures moving
Fair Play ...... Not Cheat
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
OK folks, the 3rd benchmark is a "heavy" one: real-time shadows!
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test3.html
With Firefox I get 49-51 FPS and choppy motion.
With Chrome I get 59 FPS and smooth motion.
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test3.html
With Firefox I get 49-51 FPS and choppy motion.
With Chrome I get 59 FPS and smooth motion.
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I had the same results. By the way, don't try it with IE. Or you can but won't be surprised about what you will see...Remus wrote:OK folks, the 3rd benchmark is a "heavy" one: real-time shadows!
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test3.html
With Firefox I get 49-51 FPS and choppy motion.
With Chrome I get 59 FPS and smooth motion.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I tested several times to be sure because this time i couldn't see a big difference between chrome and firefox.
With both i reached 59-60 fps after a few sec., graphic slightly jerks. I think with chrome it's a bit smoother.
By the way, i tried it with IE on another PC (not my):
I reached 64-65 fps! with firefox 59
8 core Xeon CPU E3-1275 v3 @3,5 GHz
16 GB RAM
Nvidia quadro K2000
Win7 (64 bit)
However the graphic is still very choppy.
With both i reached 59-60 fps after a few sec., graphic slightly jerks. I think with chrome it's a bit smoother.
By the way, i tried it with IE on another PC (not my):
I reached 64-65 fps! with firefox 59
8 core Xeon CPU E3-1275 v3 @3,5 GHz
16 GB RAM
Nvidia quadro K2000
Win7 (64 bit)
However the graphic is still very choppy.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Do you get choppy motion for "test3" or for all of them?gmi wrote:I tested several times to be sure because this time i couldn't see a big difference between chrome and firefox.
With both i reached 59-60 fps after a few sec., graphic slightly jerks. I think with chrome it's a bit smoother.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
With firefox i get choppy motion for all tests.
I don't see performance differences, FPS always between 57-60.
With chrome it's the same, no differences between test 1-3, FPS 58-60.
But motion is smoother with chrome.
Edit:
I was wrong, 4 cores and 8 threads.
I don't see performance differences, FPS always between 57-60.
With chrome it's the same, no differences between test 1-3, FPS 58-60.
But motion is smoother with chrome.
Edit:
I was wrong, 4 cores and 8 threads.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
58-60 FPS for all the tests is awesome (especially for real-time shadows).gmi wrote:With firefox i get choppy motion for all tests.
I don't see performance differences, FPS always between 57-60.
With chrome it's the same, no differences between test 1-3, FPS 58-60.
But motion is smoother with chrome.
But with Google Chrome I get VERY smooth motion in any test.
Do you have open other browser windows or tabs?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
No I have nothing else open. Yes it is smoother with chrome but still a bit choppy.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I get the best results (very smooth motion and 59-60 FPS) with Google Chrome 26 only!gmi wrote:No I have nothing else open. Yes it is smoother with chrome but still a bit choppy.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
The 4th benchmark comes with dynamic lighting, real-time shadows, lens flares and ... smarter dog
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test4.html
Please tell me if you get a significant FPS drop.
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test4.html
Please tell me if you get a significant FPS drop.
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Firefox
34-44 FPS
It's not smooth.
Chrome
57-60 FPS
It's smooth.
Warning: the dog bites.
34-44 FPS
It's not smooth.
Chrome
57-60 FPS
It's smooth.
Warning: the dog bites.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I get the same results for all tests. Choppy motion with firefox 57-60 fps, smoother motion with chrome 59-60 fps.
With the other pc i get very smooth motion with firefox (59-60 fps) even when i have many tabs and programs open.
With the other pc i get very smooth motion with firefox (59-60 fps) even when i have many tabs and programs open.
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Ditto - Firefox was 38-42 not smooth, Chrome was beautiful and steady 58
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Excellent results guys!
Thanks for feedback.
Please give me more details about that computer: processor, graphics card, OS and Firefox version.
Thanks for feedback.
That's impressive!gmi wrote:With the other pc i get very smooth motion with firefox (59-60 fps) even when i have many tabs and programs open.
Please give me more details about that computer: processor, graphics card, OS and Firefox version.
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 04:02
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
worst,Remus,6 FPS
(with Chrome)
(with Chrome)
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
PC: Fujitsu celsius w530Remus wrote:Excellent results guys!
Thanks for feedback.
That's impressive!gmi wrote:With the other pc i get very smooth motion with firefox (59-60 fps) even when i have many tabs and programs open.
Please give me more details about that computer: processor, graphics card, OS and Firefox version.
processor: Intel Xeon CPU E3-1275 v3 @ 3,5 GHz / 16GB RAM
graphic card: Nvidia Quadro K2000
Win 7 professional SP1
Firefox 36.0.4
It's not allowed to install chrome
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Sorry, re-tested both test 3 & 4 tonight, and both Chrome & Firefox produce steady, smooth 59 fps under any condition.slapshot wrote:Ditto - Firefox was 38-42 not smooth, Chrome was beautiful and steady 58
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Excellent result!slapshot wrote:re-tested both test 3 & 4 tonight, and both Chrome & Firefox produce steady, smooth 59 fps under any condition.
Now you can try "test4" in Full Screen mode:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test4fs.html
Press F to switch to full screen (and ESC to get back).
Windows XP
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, choppy motion and 35 FPS in Full HD (1920 x 1080).
With Chrome 26 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
Windows 7 and 8
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
With Chrome 41 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Try portable Chrome. No installation is needed. You can also have the Chrome on your flash drive.gmi wrote:PC: Fujitsu celsius w530Remus wrote:Excellent results guys!
Thanks for feedback.
That's impressive!gmi wrote:With the other pc i get very smooth motion with firefox (59-60 fps) even when i have many tabs and programs open.
Please give me more details about that computer: processor, graphics card, OS and Firefox version.
processor: Intel Xeon CPU E3-1275 v3 @ 3,5 GHz / 16GB RAM
graphic card: Nvidia Quadro K2000
Win 7 professional SP1
Firefox 36.0.4
It's not allowed to install chrome
http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/g ... e_portable
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Firefox=47-53Remus wrote:Excellent result!slapshot wrote:re-tested both test 3 & 4 tonight, and both Chrome & Firefox produce steady, smooth 59 fps under any condition.
Now you can try "test4" in Full Screen mode:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test4fs.html
Press F to switch to full screen (and ESC to get back).
Windows XP
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, choppy motion and 35 FPS in Full HD (1920 x 1080).
With Chrome 26 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
Windows 7 and 8
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
With Chrome 41 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
Chrome=49-59
Both browsers are in default settings.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
In full screen?freekarol wrote:Firefox: 47-53
Chrome: 49-59
Both browsers are in default settings.
And your monitor resolution is set to ...
Still smooth motion with Chrome?
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Yes, in full screen. The screen resolution is set to maximum=1366x768. Chrome is a little smoother than Firefox.Remus wrote:In full screen?freekarol wrote:Firefox: 47-53
Chrome: 49-59
Both browsers are in default settings.
And your monitor resolution is set to ...
Still smooth motion with Chrome?
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Test4 full screen
My pc, monitor resolution is 1280x1024:
firefox - good image quality, a bit choppy motion and 59-60 fps,
chrome - better image quality, smoother motion and 59-60 fps.
Not my pc, monitor resolution is 1920x1200:
firefox - good image quality, very smooth motion and 59-60 fps,
IE - good image quality, choppy motion but 63-65 fps!
My pc, monitor resolution is 1280x1024:
firefox - good image quality, a bit choppy motion and 59-60 fps,
chrome - better image quality, smoother motion and 59-60 fps.
Not my pc, monitor resolution is 1920x1200:
firefox - good image quality, very smooth motion and 59-60 fps,
IE - good image quality, choppy motion but 63-65 fps!
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Once again, both Chrome & Firefox produce the same results: 59-60 and holding after 3 minutes.Remus wrote: Excellent result!
Now you can try "test4" in Full Screen mode:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test4fs.html
Press F to switch to full screen (and ESC to get back).
Windows XP
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, choppy motion and 35 FPS in Full HD (1920 x 1080).
With Chrome 26 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
Windows 7 and 8
With Firefox 36 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
With Chrome 41 I get very good image quality, smooth motion and 59 FPS in Full HD.
P.S. nice flare!
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
To the 65 fps with IE: Remus, you said that 60 fps is the max. theoretical value. Is it because the monitor is usually set to 60Hz? What i didn't mention is that i also have a screen tearing issue. Somebody in a forum wrote that this occurs when the graphics card generates more fps than the monitor can show. I have no idea of all this, it's just a theory why i get more than 60 fps...gmi wrote: IE - good image quality, choppy motion but 63-65 fps!
Sorry i didn't mention this effect in my first post because it occurs even just when i scroll a web page...
However, with firefox it's perfect.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I do not limit the FPS value (for now), but in Firefox and Chrome is capped at 60.gmi wrote:To the 65 fps with IE: Remus, you said that 60 fps is the max. theoretical value. Is it because the monitor is usually set to 60Hz?
What i didn't mention is that i also have a screen tearing issue.
Somebody in a forum wrote that this occurs when the graphics card generates more fps than the monitor can show.
I have no idea of all this, it's just a theory why i get more than 60 fps...
Sorry i didn't mention this effect in my first post because it occurs even just when i scroll a web page...
However, with firefox it's perfect.
I don't know about Internet Explorer.
In any case, 60 FPS is the best value because most of the monitors cannot draw more than 60 frames per second at full resolution.
In Hopeless 2 the FPS is capped at 50.
And yes, tearing occurs when the GPU sends more frames the monitor is capable to draw.
A workaround is to turn ON the V-Sync (vertical sync).
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I'm sure you'll like the 5th benchmark:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test5.html
P = Pause
Enter = Play
R = Rewind
p.s.
I thought the video texture will kill the global performances, but with Chrome I get the same smooth motion and 59 FPS
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test5.html
P = Pause
Enter = Play
R = Rewind
p.s.
I thought the video texture will kill the global performances, but with Chrome I get the same smooth motion and 59 FPS
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Same as before, 59-60 fps with firefox and chrome, a bit choppy with firefox smoother with chrome.
I will test tomorrow with the other pc - thanks for the tip!
I will test tomorrow with the other pc - thanks for the tip!
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
It seems that my hardware likes more Chrome than Firefox:Remus wrote:I'm sure you'll like the 5th benchmark:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test5.html
P = Pause
Enter = Play
R = Rewind
p.s.
I thought the video texture will kill the global performances, but with Chrome I get the same smooth motion and 59 FPS
Firefox=40-44 fps
Chrome=59-60 fps
And just Chrome was smooth as hell.
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
2nd pc:
Still 59-60 fps with firefox, but now it's a bit choppy.
IE: i switched ON vsync but it didn't help. FPS 66, sceen tearing and very choppy. The video did not work at all, only black screen and no sound... I think i stop testing with IE.
Still 59-60 fps with firefox, but now it's a bit choppy.
IE: i switched ON vsync but it didn't help. FPS 66, sceen tearing and very choppy. The video did not work at all, only black screen and no sound... I think i stop testing with IE.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
It was MP4 vs OGG and the winner was OGGgmi wrote:IE: i switched ON vsync but it didn't help. FPS 66, sceen tearing and very choppy. The video did not work at all, only black screen and no sound... I think i stop testing with IE.
Here is why:
MP4: Chrome = yes, Firefox = no, IE9 = yes, Opera = no
OGG: Chrome = yes, Firefox = yes, IE9 = no, Opera = yes.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Initial test with my boss's P.O.S. PC gave results of 15fps. (maybe I should play from this PC!) Let me test this at home on a real PC.Remus wrote:Are you a plumber?
There is a leak in "test6" !!
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test6.html
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
- slapshot
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:01
- Location: USA, Michigan
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Ok, at home on both Chrome & Firefox steady 59. Firefox seemed like the graphics were slightly sharper. 3D sound worked great on both.
“Crunchy goodness in every box!”
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 21 Feb 2014, 22:28
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Okay today my firefox seems to have some problems. Test 5 and 6 are a lot more choppy than last time but still 55-60 fps.
With chrome it's almost perfect (59-60 fps), i only notice a very slight twitching.
With chrome it's almost perfect (59-60 fps), i only notice a very slight twitching.
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Excellent results folks!
The 7th benchmark is for all the Hopeless 2 fans:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test7.html
What do we have so far:
- 120,000 polygons
- dynamic lighting
- realtime shadows
- particles (steam)
- video texture
- lens flares
- animated skinned mesh
- HUD weapon
With Chrome I get the same smooth motion and impressive 59 FPS.
I'm waiting for your results.
In any case, all of these make HTML5 WebGL a real candidate for Hopeless 3.
The 7th benchmark is for all the Hopeless 2 fans:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test7.html
What do we have so far:
- 120,000 polygons
- dynamic lighting
- realtime shadows
- particles (steam)
- video texture
- lens flares
- animated skinned mesh
- HUD weapon
With Chrome I get the same smooth motion and impressive 59 FPS.
I'm waiting for your results.
In any case, all of these make HTML5 WebGL a real candidate for Hopeless 3.
- freekarol
- Posts: 1345
- Joined: 13 Aug 2010, 12:55
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
Remus wrote:Excellent results folks!
The 7th benchmark is for all the Hopeless 2 fans:
http://necromanthus.com/Test/html5/test7.html
What do we have so far:
- 120,000 polygons
- dynamic lighting
- realtime shadows
- particles (steam)
- video texture
- lens flares
- animated skinned mesh
- HUD weapon
With Chrome I get the same smooth motion and impressive 59 FPS.
I'm waiting for your results.
In any case, all of these make HTML5 WebGL a real candidate for Hopeless 3.
Opera= 58-60 FPS
Firefox=14-20 FPS
Mentally strong people don't put others down..
- Remus
- Posts: 7803
- Joined: 08 Oct 2009, 12:45
Re: HTML5 WebGL Benchmark
I get 59 FPS with Chrome (very smooth motion) and around 40 FPS with Firefox (choppy motion).freekarol wrote:Opera= 58-60 FPS
Firefox=14-20 FPS
In Firefox be sure this setting is enabled:
Tools / Options / Advanced / Use hardware acceleration when available