I disagree Skul, this is what start's a throw away society, and i'm a firm believer, that what goes around comes around.skul wrote: I think they will get tired of being banned and will find others to disturb.

I disagree Skul, this is what start's a throw away society, and i'm a firm believer, that what goes around comes around.skul wrote: I think they will get tired of being banned and will find others to disturb.
Remus wrote:I totally agree.skul wrote:There are a lot of good people here in Hopeless that don't deserve this cancer.
And starting today I won't unban any player.
Banned for cheating or for very bad attitude, it doesn't matter.
They are a plague, a deadly infectious disease.
When we talk about society it is a lot complex and bigger, doesn't fit here.Lenny wrote:I disagree Skul, this is what start's a throw away society, and i'm a firm believer, that what goes around comes around.skul wrote: I think they will get tired of being banned and will find others to disturb.
skul wrote:When the person knows you will always forgive her, she will always repeat that.Lenny wrote:I disagree Skul, this is what start's a throw away society, and i'm a firm believer, that what goes around comes around.skul wrote: I think they will get tired of being banned and will find others to disturb.
I decide with my heart and brain , that's why I am still in the game and playing. :)skul wrote: Supreme and Lenny,
Please, listen more the reason and less your hearts.
supreme wrote:Let me give you example of my niece who was insisting to have dirty shoe in her mouth, I stopped her for doing that but she started to crying, I yelled a bit that NO but she didn't listen, started to cry more. Then I said ok fine have this but please listen to me first. She agreed and I told her that these shoes are yuk., and there is much dirt and they are dirty. She kept on watching and listening as well then she also said yukkk. And left those shoes.
Moral: If I would keep on saying No and keep on being harsh. She won't listen but in turn she would be aggressive and Stubborn. So I had to deal her at her level.
You got banned for bad attitude.turk_askeri wrote:Remus if u want ..
Can u opened my BAN ?
as u wantRemus wrote:You got banned for bad attitude.turk_askeri wrote:Remus if u want ..
Can u opened my BAN ?
You told me and moderators to visit a BEACH or something.![]()
Two more weeks in jail for you.
We'll see after that.
Don't spam the forum for one week.turk_askeri wrote:as u wantRemus wrote:You got banned for bad attitude.
You told me and moderators to visit a BEACH or something.![]()
Two more weeks in jail for you.
We'll see after that.
okRemus wrote:Don't spam the forum for one week.turk_askeri wrote:as u wantRemus wrote:You got banned for bad attitude.
You told me and moderators to visit a BEACH or something.![]()
Two more weeks in jail for you.
We'll see after that.
On novemeber 21th come here and ask again.
okéslapshot wrote:Turk_askeri, I've never had any against you personally. At one time I thought you were a good person. If you do as Remus asks, I can forget the things you said about me and forgive.
Agreed?
Remus, as far as unban is not an option anymore will he have to come with new account starting from zero ? At least I think this would be the most fair to clean his mouth, mind and soul.Remus wrote:Don't spam the forum for one week.turk_askeri wrote:as u wantRemus wrote:You got banned for bad attitude.
You told me and moderators to visit a BEACH or something.![]()
Two more weeks in jail for you.
We'll see after that.
On novemeber 21th come here and ask again.
I do not unban accounts banned for cheating.skul wrote:Remus, as far as unban is not an option anymore will he have to come with new account starting from zero ? At least I think this would be the most fair to clean his mouth, mind and soul.![]()
Ok, maybe a scale starting with 30% frags cut for the first time he is banned. I mean it makes the player thinks twice before having any bad attitude again, cause the player will know that he has a lot to lose. One month banned seems not to be enough, cause some repeat bad attitudes.Remus wrote:I do not unban accounts banned for cheating.skul wrote:Remus, as far as unban is not an option anymore will he have to come with new account starting from zero ? At least I think this would be the most fair to clean his mouth, mind and soul.![]()
But the players banned for bad attitude always get another chance (if they ask for it).
![]()
p.s.
They all have another account.
So that "starting from zero" does not change anything.
Why don't we write a book of law? So that we can tell all players in our government that by Rule maker "abc", judge "xyz" and rule "123", dear criminal " you are suspended from your job and you are disqualified for any other job and you would have to live in jail for this much period and you would be charged this much frags as penalty and you are not eligible to apply for "SORRY" next time without punishment as you are caught for BAD Attitude."skul wrote:Ok, maybe a scale starting with 30% frags cut for the first time he is banned. I mean it makes the player thinks twice before having any bad attitude again, cause the player will know that he has a lot to lose. One month banned seems not to be enough, cause some repeat bad attitudes.Remus wrote:I do not unban accounts banned for cheating.skul wrote:Remus, as far as unban is not an option anymore will he have to come with new account starting from zero ? At least I think this would be the most fair to clean his mouth, mind and soul.![]()
But the players banned for bad attitude always get another chance (if they ask for it).
p.s.
They all have another account.
So that "starting from zero" does not change anything.
Reducing 30% of frags would be a very good help for cleaning of mind and soul (and mouth).
The first time banned: 30% frags reduction and 1 month banned. Second time: 50% frags reduction and 2 months banned. The third time : ban forever. (unban just for bad attitude)
It doesn't work in that way.skul wrote:Ok, maybe a scale starting with 30% frags cut for the first time he is banned. I mean it makes the player thinks twice before having any bad attitude again, cause the player will know that he has a lot to lose. One month banned seems not to be enough, cause some repeat bad attitudes.
Reducing 30% of frags would be a very good help for cleaning of mind and soul (and mouth).
The first time banned: 30% frags reduction and 1 month banned. Second time: 50% frags reduction and 2 months banned. The third time : ban forever. (unban just for bad attitude)
Marcos,Kinho40 wrote:I was playing field in ABC a few minutes ago.
And I could not kill a Turkish player due to his bad connection.
I spoke in Portuguese "other immortal" at the same time that Philip entered the map.
He thought I would have talked to him and verbally assaulted me on the map.
I explained to him what it was and he apologized to me, but I think your friend did not understand and then I had to endure all this on the map.
If this is not a bad attitude I do not know what can be considered.
I had no particular problem with it.Remus wrote:Marcos,Kinho40 wrote:I was playing field in ABC a few minutes ago.
And I could not kill a Turkish player due to his bad connection.
I spoke in Portuguese "other immortal" at the same time that Philip entered the map.
He thought I would have talked to him and verbally assaulted me on the map.
I explained to him what it was and he apologized to me, but I think your friend did not understand and then I had to endure all this on the map.
If this is not a bad attitude I do not know what can be considered.
Do you have a personal problem with Gallego?
I ask because face to face insults (in certain limits) are allowed.
Take that "hijo de puta" as "you are a very good player".
It's up to you.Kinho40 wrote:I had no particular problem with it.
But after all this, I now have.
One more that I hope does not come into the field when I'm playing.
I'll kick out the act.
Warning given.
For me, NEVERRemus wrote:It's up to you.Kinho40 wrote:I had no particular problem with it.
But after all this, I now have.
One more that I hope does not come into the field when I'm playing.
I'll kick out the act.
Warning given.
![]()
Marcos, do you want to give another chance to poor (but very proud) kirby?
The decision in this case is yours.Kinho40 wrote:For me, NEVERRemus wrote:Marcos, do you want to give another chance to poor (but very proud) kirby?
![]()
But I respect your decision.
Poor _Type-R I can only say this..... He is going to be vaporised. Go Go KihnoRemus wrote:The decision in this case is yours.Kinho40 wrote:For me, NEVERRemus wrote:Marcos, do you want to give another chance to poor (but very proud) kirby?
![]()
But I respect your decision.
If your answer is NEVER, you're going to play against _Type-R and other similar accounts.
Excuse me, I answered your question.Remus wrote:The decision in this case is yours.Kinho40 wrote:For me, NEVERRemus wrote:Marcos, do you want to give another chance to poor (but very proud) kirby?
![]()
But I respect your decision.
If your answer is NEVER, you're going to play against _Type-R and other similar accounts.
Yes I know, your answer was always NO.Kinho40 wrote:Excuse me, I answered your question.
The game is yours.
And in this case my opinion has no value, as has happened at other times.
So the decision to back a player or not is exclusively yours and not mine.
Remus wrote:Yes I know, your answer was always NO.Kinho40 wrote:Excuse me, I answered your question.
The game is yours.
And in this case my opinion has no value, as has happened at other times.
So the decision to back a player or not is exclusively yours and not mine.
But you didn't understand my point of view.
Again:
kirby got banned for bad attitude.
He came back with Baby_Kripy
Baby_Kripy got banned for bad attitude.
He came back with _Type-R
What's next Marcos?
What do you expect to achieve?
Because you cannot educate someone with this approach.
I have to repeat myself: in this case the decision is yours.Kinho40 wrote:But in the case of Kirby, Baby_Krypi, El_Destroyer Type_R and if he comes back and I'm online I'll take it all so fields.
You decide if it comes back or not.
My friend Remus, this is your game, you're the boss.Remus wrote:I have to repeat myself: in this case the decision is yours.Kinho40 wrote:But in the case of Kirby, Baby_Krypi, El_Destroyer Type_R and if he comes back and I'm online I'll take it all so fields.
You decide if it comes back or not.
But try to educate them first of all.
Otherwise we'll get a huge and worthless list of banned players.
In fact none of them is banned, they're all active using other accounts.
I hope you got my point.
1) It works in most of the casesKinho40 wrote:1) You tried to find a way to educate them banning. It did not work.
2) The way I found to educate them and kicking off the map.
3) But you decide whether or not the Kirby back.
The decision is yours alone.
Remus wrote:1) It works in most of the casesKinho40 wrote:1) You tried to find a way to educate them banning. It did not work.
2) The way I found to educate them and kicking off the map.
3) But you decide whether or not the Kirby back.
The decision is yours alone.
2) That's also an option
3) I told you my condition:
I want kirby to come here and to say: "Kinho40, please forgive me".
Thank you Remus, very good this number " 2 "....Remus wrote:It doesn't work in that way.skul wrote:Ok, maybe a scale starting with 30% frags cut for the first time he is banned. I mean it makes the player thinks twice before having any bad attitude again, cause the player will know that he has a lot to lose. One month banned seems not to be enough, cause some repeat bad attitudes.
Reducing 30% of frags would be a very good help for cleaning of mind and soul (and mouth).
The first time banned: 30% frags reduction and 1 month banned. Second time: 50% frags reduction and 2 months banned. The third time : ban forever. (unban just for bad attitude)
1) the players banned for bad attitude get another chance after 2-4 weeks.
They cannot use that account for 2-4 weeks, that's the penalty
2) if they get banned again, bye-bye
Scrappitt wrote:You will be a good mother someday
![]()
Sorry, but this was just to see my Brazilian friends.Lenny wrote:I'm sorry Marcos, (my friend) I mean you no disrespect, but i think you need to look at why you keep getting into these arguments![]()
Peace my brother
Kinho40 wrote:And Lenny, this is my personality, I will not change.
Kinho40 wrote: whatever I do I sign here and I assume I will continue doing so and maybe if more people like me show up here, maybe we can clear this game
Gracias mi amigo...moisex wrote:Estoy de acuerdo con Kinho. Es de los jugadores mas honestos que conozco y realiza un trabalo importante en el juego. Animo Kinho y no cambies , jugadores como tu hacen mucha falta.
Did you boot him first and he responded in return?JackFrost wrote:cursing my family- over Badcon issues, because i made him reboot!
supreme I think that is not the point. Those kind of words are inappropriate even if Jack kicked him first!! Jack next time try to be more suptile and first ask him to reboot with please on the end of the sentencesupreme wrote:Did you boot him first and he responded in return?JackFrost wrote:cursing my family- over Badcon issues, because i made him reboot!
Ok, its not the point. No matter how hard you beat(kick out) somebody, He should not open his mouth. This is what you want to say?profesorhr wrote:supreme I think that is not the point. Those kind of words are inappropriate even if Jack kicked him first!! Jack next time try to be more suptile and first ask him to reboot with please on the end of the sentencesupreme wrote:Did you boot him first and he responded in return?JackFrost wrote:cursing my family- over Badcon issues, because i made him reboot!
Ok, its not the point. No matter how hard you beat(kick out) somebody, He should not open his mouth. This is what you want to say?supreme wrote: supreme I think that is not the point. Those kind of words are inappropriate even if Jack kicked him first!! Jack next time try to be more suptile and first ask him to reboot with please on the end of the sentence
profesorhr wrote: supreme I think that is not the point. Those kind of words are inappropriate even if Jack kicked him first!! Jack next time try to be more suptile and first ask him to reboot with please on the end of the sentence
supreme wrote: Ok, its not the point. No matter how hard you beat(kick out) somebody, He should not open his mouth. This is what you want to say?
I am not saying that what sedko said is right but i am also saying that for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. Being a prof you know this theory :)
profesorhr wrote: Yes you are right supreme and that is the third Newton's law. I know this better than you. I am only saying that those words are inappropriate. You can start debate with some other words or you can just refrase the sentance. For instance " Jack why did you kick me out without worning?" or "Please Jack explain to me why did you out me!" I think in normal society you don't start to curse right away if someone hurts you. So dear supreme don't get me wrong here I am not trying to defend Jack, I am only saying that sedko's words are inappropriate. How would you feel if someone tells you #f***k your m****r and w**e and s****r. You noticed little * in every word I write??
P.S. Please don't get into my field of interest (physics) if you are not planing to extend the discussion
A valid question for JackFrost.supreme wrote: I did not see sedko behaving like this, So I wanted to ask the reason. Even when someone killed some person. The Police / Judge ask them the reason that Why he did this. They don't hang him immediately.